The peer review process of our journals is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing. Peer review is a critical component that ensures the quality, validity, and integrity of the research published in our journal.
Initial Evaluation:
Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the journal team to ensure they align with the journal’s scope and guidelines.
Ethical Considerations:
Reporting any ethical concerns such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or other ethical violations.
Assignment to Reviewers:
Suitable manuscripts are assigned to expert reviewers based on their expertise and availability.
Peer Review:
Reviewers critically assess the manuscript’s content, methodology, originality, and overall contribution to the field.
Reviewer Recommendations:
Reviewers provide detailed recommendations to the editor, including suggestions for revisions or a final publication decision.
Editorial Decision:
Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editor makes a decision to accept, request revisions, or reject the manuscript. Authors are informed of the decision along with the reviewers’ comments.
Transparency and Accountability
We are committed to maintaining transparency in our peer review process. The identities of reviewers are kept confidential, ensuring unbiased and objective evaluations. Authors are encouraged to address reviewers’ comments to enhance the quality of their work.
Appeals and Feedback
Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions. Additionally, we welcome feedback on our peer review process to continually improve and uphold the standards of our journals.
For any inquiries or further information, please contact the editorial department at [email address].